Articles

A physician-authored methodology guide for plaintiff attorneys, defense attorneys, insurance counsel, and judges explaining exactly how a board-certified pain management physician objectively evaluates pain — covering examination components, imaging correlation, validated outcome measures, functional impairment, symptom validity, and condition-specific analysis.

How pain management physicians distinguish pre-existing degeneration from aggravation, acceleration, and new traumatic injury — the clinical methodology for building or challenging causation in spine personal injury litigation. Plaintiff and defense.

A Texas attorney guide to how pain management physicians build objective clinical foundations for non-economic damages after Gregory v. Chohan — covering validated disability instruments, functional impairment analysis, condition-specific findings, future care projections, and plaintiff and defense strategy for Harris County, Dallas County, and statewide litigation.

The definitive attorney guide to CRPS expert witness evaluation — covering Budapest Criteria documentation, Type I vs. Type II, trauma and surgery-related causation, medical necessity, SCS, sympathetic blocks, future care projections, defense and plaintiff arguments, and common attorney mistakes in Complex Regional Pain Syndrome litigation.

Medical expert analysis of dog bite injuries, including crush and puncture trauma, peripheral nerve injury, CRPS, scar pain, functional impairment, medical necessity, and future care.

Attorney guide to pain management expert witness opinions in California personal injury and medical malpractice litigation — covering Evidence Code §§ 720, 801-802, Sargon, MICRA, comparative fault, IMEs, SCS, ESI, RFA, CRPS, and future medical care analysis from an actively practicing California pain management physician.

A comprehensive attorney guide to pain management expert witness opinions in Arizona personal injury and malpractice litigation — covering Rule 702, A.R.S. § 12-2604, Rule 26.1, compulsory arbitration, medical necessity, causation, ESI, RFA, SCS, CRPS, and future medical care disputes in Maricopa County, Pima County, and statewide.

A Florida attorney guide to pain management expert qualification under § 766.102, the pre-suit corroborating opinion requirement under § 766.203, Daubert reliability under § 90.702, and how these requirements apply to ESI, RFA, SCS, IDDS, and CRPS cases in malpractice and personal injury litigation statewide.

A Nevada attorney guide to SCS disputes in personal injury and malpractice litigation — necessity, standard of care, causation, trial documentation, psychological evaluation, CRPS, post-laminectomy syndrome, and future care projections for Clark County, Washoe County, and statewide cases.

A Florida attorney guide to medical necessity disputes in PIP, personal injury, and malpractice litigation — covering ESI, RFA, SCS, IDDS, PNS, and CRPS disputes under Florida's Daubert standard, with plaintiff and defense strategy for Miami-Dade, Broward, Palm Beach, and statewide cases.

A practical guide for Texas plaintiff and defense attorneys on Chapter 74 expert report requirements, pain management expert qualifications, causation and medical necessity analysis, future care projections, and procedure-specific disputes — ESI, RFA, SCS, IDDS, and CRPS — in Harris County, Dallas County, and statewide litigation.

A practical guide for Nevada plaintiff and defense attorneys on retaining a pain management expert witness — covering IMEs, causation, medical necessity, future care, standard of care, CRPS, SCS, ESI, RFA, IDDS, and PNS disputes in Clark County, Washoe County, and statewide litigation.

A clinical guide for plaintiff and defense counsel on SCS trial documentation requirements, permanent implantation criteria, psychological screening, revision surgery disputes, battery replacement projections, explantation analysis, and future medical care opinions in personal injury and malpractice litigation.

How to distinguish two clinical concepts that every pain management litigation attorney must understand — with procedure-specific examples covering ESI, MBB/RFA, SCS, IDDS, and PNS, and guidance on which analysis applies to malpractice, personal injury, future care, and insurance coverage disputes.

A clinical framework for plaintiff and defense counsel: how physician experts assess necessity for epidural steroid injections, medial branch blocks, radiofrequency ablation, spinal cord stimulation, and intrathecal pump therapy — and how those opinions connect to causation, future care, and malpractice analysis.

A clinical framework covering aggravation doctrine, pre-existing degeneration, CRPS causation disputes, post-laminectomy syndrome chain-of-causation, delayed presentation, subsequent injury apportionment, and the causation foundation required for future care projections.